<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hello Progbloggers&#8230; again</title>
	<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/</link>
	<description>Everything but steak.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 23:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: digitalon</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-16080</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-16080</guid>
					<description>This is my Digital Camera And Cell Phones &lt;a href=&quot;http://digitalon.info/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blog&lt;/a&gt;. 
Full reviews of digital cameras and cellphones reviews... enjoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my Digital Camera And Cell Phones <a href="http://digitalon.info/" rel="nofollow">Blog</a>.<br />
Full reviews of digital cameras and cellphones reviews&#8230; enjoy
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4707</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4707</guid>
					<description>You didn\'t need to put even &lt;strong&gt;more&lt;/strong&gt; emphasis on it, Jan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn\&#8217;t need to put even <strong>more</strong> emphasis on it, Jan.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4703</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4703</guid>
					<description>That &lt;i&gt;succesful comic&lt;/i&gt;-comment by Polly is probably the funniest thing I've seen on Gluemeat for &lt;i&gt;months&lt;/i&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That <i>succesful comic</i>-comment by Polly is probably the funniest thing I&#8217;ve seen on Gluemeat for <i>months</i>&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4697</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4697</guid>
					<description>RP: Right back atcha...!

Salena: You're going to get more than a fruit basket.  Can you say &quot;floral arrangement?&quot; Good, I'm glad you can.  You'll be getting bacon.  Also, you need a gravatar.

Polly: It's nice to hear from you again!  I just don't know where you got this &quot;successful comic&quot; thing from, but I'll just smile politely and say &quot;Yeah.&quot; Also, you mentioned &quot;out-of-control feminism.&quot; I didn't know there such a thing as &quot;controlled feminism.&quot;

Saksboy: That's not a bad tip, actually.  But I prefer to bombard the progblog space with my upcoming 73-part series: Pictures of Kitties In Diapers.

Scott: Wait... if you don't have &quot;people,&quot; who were those hirsute people I traded campfire songs with the other night?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RP: Right back atcha&#8230;!</p>
<p>Salena: You&#8217;re going to get more than a fruit basket.  Can you say &#8220;floral arrangement?&#8221; Good, I&#8217;m glad you can.  You&#8217;ll be getting bacon.  Also, you need a gravatar.</p>
<p>Polly: It&#8217;s nice to hear from you again!  I just don&#8217;t know where you got this &#8220;successful comic&#8221; thing from, but I&#8217;ll just smile politely and say &#8220;Yeah.&#8221; Also, you mentioned &#8220;out-of-control feminism.&#8221; I didn&#8217;t know there such a thing as &#8220;controlled feminism.&#8221;</p>
<p>Saksboy: That&#8217;s not a bad tip, actually.  But I prefer to bombard the progblog space with my upcoming 73-part series: Pictures of Kitties In Diapers.</p>
<p>Scott: Wait&#8230; if you don&#8217;t have &#8220;people,&#8221; who were those hirsute people I traded campfire songs with the other night?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Scott Tribe</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4694</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4694</guid>
					<description>Saying you've tested my patience is a bit of a stretch, Polly. :) 

As for &quot;my people&quot;... I am going to state for the umpteenth time for Mike's sake to clarify this once again - I am not the actual head of the site or its chief administrator. That honour goes to Wayne Chu.  I'm just one of 4 people who have the title &quot;moderator&quot; that helps Wayne manage the site. Since I have been primarily doing the blog approvals/disapprovals anyhow, and since Wayne and Bart have  been both away, and Dr Dawg is on a leave of absence while his partner is fighting cancer, that leaves myself and James Bowie to make sure the site doesnt self-destruct til Wayne gets back and/or Bart returns from vacation ;) James is still a fairly new moderator,  so blog maintenance and so on is more or less left to me.

We've never had a litmus test really on blogs and how much political content they need to have. We all like a change of pace from that occasionally. There are quite frankly at least 2 blogs on now (not Polly's!) that I'm lucky to see 1 political writing every 2-3 weeks. But, since they were some of the first original members of the place before things got really big really fast, they've been left alone - as have any other blogs that deal a fair deal in personal blogs.

Its the &quot;new&quot; blogs applying to us for membership that we carefully check for both what they say politically and also how much politics they post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying you&#8217;ve tested my patience is a bit of a stretch, Polly. <img src='http://www.gluemeat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>As for &#8220;my people&#8221;&#8230; I am going to state for the umpteenth time for Mike&#8217;s sake to clarify this once again - I am not the actual head of the site or its chief administrator. That honour goes to Wayne Chu.  I&#8217;m just one of 4 people who have the title &#8220;moderator&#8221; that helps Wayne manage the site. Since I have been primarily doing the blog approvals/disapprovals anyhow, and since Wayne and Bart have  been both away, and Dr Dawg is on a leave of absence while his partner is fighting cancer, that leaves myself and James Bowie to make sure the site doesnt self-destruct til Wayne gets back and/or Bart returns from vacation <img src='http://www.gluemeat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  James is still a fairly new moderator,  so blog maintenance and so on is more or less left to me.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve never had a litmus test really on blogs and how much political content they need to have. We all like a change of pace from that occasionally. There are quite frankly at least 2 blogs on now (not Polly&#8217;s!) that I&#8217;m lucky to see 1 political writing every 2-3 weeks. But, since they were some of the first original members of the place before things got really big really fast, they&#8217;ve been left alone - as have any other blogs that deal a fair deal in personal blogs.</p>
<p>Its the &#8220;new&#8221; blogs applying to us for membership that we carefully check for both what they say politically and also how much politics they post.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Saskboy</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4693</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4693</guid>
					<description>I only write political about 60% of the time, and haven't been kicked out of a political blogroll yet, so I wouldn't worry. One thing you could possibly do, is create a politics category, and so anything posted with that tag would show on the progblogs if you gave them that URL for your blog instead. I did that with one roll I'm on to weed out things not at all related to their roll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only write political about 60% of the time, and haven&#8217;t been kicked out of a political blogroll yet, so I wouldn&#8217;t worry. One thing you could possibly do, is create a politics category, and so anything posted with that tag would show on the progblogs if you gave them that URL for your blog instead. I did that with one roll I&#8217;m on to weed out things not at all related to their roll.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Polly Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4692</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4692</guid>
					<description>I remember...I really liked Tasteful Future.  Of course, now that you've drawn attention to this issue of political blogs versus those with a political slant, some of us might have to negotiate our place with Progressive Bloggers too.  And, I have already tested Scott's patience with my out-of-control feminism...and I don't write a successful comic...so, I guess that's it for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember&#8230;I really liked Tasteful Future.  Of course, now that you&#8217;ve drawn attention to this issue of political blogs versus those with a political slant, some of us might have to negotiate our place with Progressive Bloggers too.  And, I have already tested Scott&#8217;s patience with my out-of-control feminism&#8230;and I don&#8217;t write a successful comic&#8230;so, I guess that&#8217;s it for me&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Salena</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4691</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4691</guid>
					<description>Do I get a gift basket? If so I would like it to include a monkapotamus. Or a goaticorn. Or are those not politically correct? 

And thus ends another chapter of pointless commenting. Goodnight and good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I get a gift basket? If so I would like it to include a monkapotamus. Or a goaticorn. Or are those not politically correct? </p>
<p>And thus ends another chapter of pointless commenting. Goodnight and good luck.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: RP.</title>
		<link>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4690</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.gluemeat.com/2006/08/30/hello-progbloggers-again/#comment-4690</guid>
					<description>Here's looking at you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s looking at you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
